RSS

Writing information in HTML

Tsegay’s First Styled Page

Tsegay’s HTML and CSS Practice Page

Welcome to my practice Page!

I have been practicing the very basics of HTML and CSS, as a basic knowledge for writing in internet pages. i have to know all the sings, spaces, slash and other codes to help to put styles(like font, color, navigationbar,paddibg, boundary, and so on) to our writing material.

There should be more here, but i don’t know what yet. 
For those interested to visit some basic tutorial on HTML/CSS: look hear

I have styles for coloring background, headings, padding, position of links(right, left) and so on as you can see it the above image, but it doesn’t appear in here. I only can see the style change when i browse from my desktop. Can anybody suggest…how? Thanks

Made 03 Nov, 2011
 
 
 

Production of Information for Internet

I have been reviewing materials related to production of information for Internet as one of my course. Hence, the concept in itself is susceptible to multiple approaches and meaning, for the digital environment is complex and dynamic in its existence , and digital resources that are functional and accessible for various purpose by numerous users on a rate-less times. As it’s clear for all of us, it’s difficult this time to know what exactly the digital information in number or type are. Its digital deepth and breadth environment contains huge, various in type, and difficult to classify amount of information in it. This is to mean the resources continuously have been created by individual, group/community, governmental and nongovernmental organizations, commercial merchandisers, news agents and users themselves in infinite amount per day, week or annual. Therefore, we require a general guidline on how to interact, access and use in this environment. I have point out some collection of ideas in consideration to contemplate production of information in online.

Nevertheless, various Internet resource researchers and educators have tried to study Internet based information production by focusing on the various dimensions of the web, considering the multi dimension nature of the digital world. For instance, some try to see the information in Internet according to the readers usability background, some on the purpose of the content it serves to users( commercial, news, educational and so on), others still prefer to see it in terms of its technological acceptance and accessibility. Therefore, based on what I found in some related literatures, i have indicated points to consider while producing information for Internet.

Please have a look the following points:

    1. The nature of your reader/viewers ( sex,age( children, young and old people),disadvantage,minorities,gender, and so on)
    2. The purpose of the message ( Why do you want to write on this idea?), information for
    3. Producing information for what( commercial, personal,government,education and so on)
    4. Accessibility and usability of contents writing mechanism ( fonts, indent, space, color, browser)
            • User-friendliness
            • Inclusiveness
    1. The type/form your information requires ( text, audio,video,animation)
    2. Depending on the type of information, make your writing short and long
    3. Reliability in relation to safety and privacy issues, including user-generated content and online communication services
    4. Copy right issues
    5. Reference( source of information)

I will be so glad if others can add or comment to the above points….

 
 

OER Movement

Various open educational resource advocates have forwarded their opinion, suggestion and possible solution on how to develop, distribute, and make OER expandable to everywhere under the concept of free educational resource for all. I have also tried to understand the need to raise this issue, the various opportunities that OER creates, and possible challenges and opportunities that movements can bring. For this reasons, I am convinced enough to participate in most movements on Open Educational Resource movements and practices.

The Open education resource movement has worked hard to widely expand the equity, usability and mind sharing among people all over the globe. It does surprise me the diversified types of knowledge area that this movement under its conceptual framework is trying to address, but I am also quiet impressed for the works already done to on awareness creation and material production. As it’s shown in many of the open resource materials, it’s clear that variety free technological( software and hard ware) inputs have been thought of, production capacities and challenges were proposed, distribution and expansion over the web were made openly available. Thanks to the innovation of the web which link educational resource and its end beneficiaries at the same point. Hence, if the availability and accessibility of open educational resources over the web reached to some optimal stage, its effect on creating knowledge society, skilled human personnel, educational literate( particularly in developing countries), and educational literacy would be assured in short time.

 

However, Stephen has mentioned in his review the threats that he think could hinder this movement and its possible inclusive solutions to make the OER sustainable. As a result, he described the challenges in a question saying that, “ what they are, who creates them, how we pay for this, how we distribute them and how we work with them”(2006). For the sake of explanation, he started by the definition of ‘Open’ in contrary to its commercial value of resources. Therefore, considering the vagueness and variety conceptual understanding amoung various organizations( UNESCO), private agents and individuals, he has stated the various alternative explanations and conceptual understandings on the issue. Moreover, as Ed Walker (2005) cited by Stephen(2006), defines ‘open’ as “convenient, effective, affordable, and sustainable and available to every learner and teacher worldwide.” Or Sir john Daniel, cited by Stephen (2006) who speaks of “The 4 As: accessible, appropriate, accredited, affordable.” In explanation to who creates them Stephen has also proposed possibly workable models of funding for open educational resource production. In a major aim to make distributional process and enabling the end user , he has also forwarded technical models in appreciation to the ones already initiated and made usable. As part of the methods to ease distribution of educational resources he has also encouraged to make our learning objects as reusable for continual applications. He hoped that “the sharable and reusable learning resources would reduce the cost needed to produce them” (2006). Moreover, he has also emphasized the inclusion of community not only as mere users but also as content creators, hence, in his explanation said, “It will be important to think of OERs not in isolation, but with respect to the community that accesses them and uses them “Open Content + Community = Open Course.” Hence, the development of a sustainable open content community is an integral part of the development of a network of OERs” (2006). Therefore, Stephen has intensively commented not only on this issues, but also other issues, the quality of the materials, the contribution of open softwares, re-usability and question of adaptation and modification in relation to copy right and publications.

 

In a nut shell, I also support this moment under the concept of, these knowledge, skill or attitude generating educational resources has to be given or made accessible to everyone as just a right to any human. They are the means and re-means for sustainable open educational resources usability and developments. As it’s stated free as freedom, not free as free beer.

Reference:

1. Stephen D. 2007. Sustainable Open Educational Resources in Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. [online] Available at: <http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=>[Accessed 26 October 2011]

 
 

A New Rail way in Ethiopia

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 26, 2011 in Surprisingly impresive

 

Information Visualization: by David McCandle

It reminds me of when I find myself as more visual learner than auditory, after filling the learning style questionnaire. I understand things more in visual descriptions than aural explanation. In explanation to visualization or information graphics, it’s stated as:

Information graphics or infographics are graphic visual representations of information, data or knowledge. These graphics present complex information quickly and clearly,[1] such as in signs, maps, journalism, technical writing, and education. With an information graphic, computer scientists, mathematicians, and statisticians develop and communicate concepts using a single symbol to process information”( wiki, September 2011).

Moreover, I see the work of infographics in the same way as David said, it helps us to ‘compress or condense’ the huge amount flow of information around us. I t will provide us a simple, clear and quick to understand kind of information. It’s true that the information visualization will take you more closer to comprehend than you it with listening, smelling and so on. However, though this and more benefits can be acquired from information graphics data description, selection of the appropriate type and style of infographics for given audience or viewer will not be less worthy. For instance David has used various babbles, matrix, diagrams, bar graphs and so on. This should be determined by the nature of our audience or consumers of the final out put inforgraphics design. Besides, I appreciate the way the different information and data were described and connected across the world, but I also doubt the credibility of the information when I see then all together . For instance, the billion dollar O-Grame, which shows the financial expenditure of the different couturiers in the world for various purpose. It’s true that it makes me to see the information more closer and easily understood, but still my mind has remained with a question of trustfulness.

 Conclusively, I am definitely convinced enough on the versatile and multidimensional data description in infographic. We, as human being we interact, learn and gather information 80% with our eyes, with all the rest of our sense organs is only 20%. Beside this, it’s tiresome to make information analysis on the daily, weekly, monthly or annually flowing of information from all over the world. For this reason, I accept and even appreciate the production and development of information design or visualization of information and data. I would like to finalize my short reflection with the expression of David from the presentation; “I am hungry for knowledge and understanding”, then he reason out the concept of visualization as; “ visualization squeezes the balk of information into few but simple and easy to undersnatd”. Having saying this I also would like to reconsider points like, the openness of information( which was raised from the participants), credibility of source, appropriateness and overloaded structure and style.

Reference:

  1. Fundación Telefónica, 2011. Visualization of Information. [online] Available at: <http://mediateca.fundacion.telefonica.com/visor.asp?e7523-a14758> [Accessed 20 October 2011].

  2. Wikipedia, 2011. Information graphics: [online] Available at:

    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infographic> [Accessed 20 October 2011].

 
 

The most impressive vedio courses of Khan academy

 

By TED.

I really appreciate and thank to initiate and produced such kind of a great academic works which could SUPPORT THE LEARNERS OF THE WORLD TO UNLOCK THEIR UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE. kEEP DOING THE GREAT JOBS.

The Khan Academy has 68,000,000 views from 2,400 videos on YouTube! It is revolutionizing the the world of education.

You can also visit his site: kahnacademy

 
 

HIGHLY VALUABLE ONLINE RADIO FOR EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY

This is the expression i found on the main webbsite of Stephen Downe.
It explains itself as:
Ed Radio, the home of all things educational and technology. Hosted by Stephen Downes, Ed Radio plays clips from live conferences, interviews, videos and more.
Ed Radio is web radio,meaning you can listen to it over the internet. by Stephen Downes

This is the URL for interested people:http://208.82.115.69:8009/stream. It is full of valuable educational and technology concepts, experience, and so on.

Enjoy!

 
 

The art of wearable communication

Artist Kate Hartman uses wearable electronics to explore how we communicate, with ourselves and with the world. In this quirky and thought-provoking talk, she shows the “Talk to Yourself Hat”, the “Inflatable Heart”, the “Glacier Embracing Suit”, and other unexpected devices. Taken from TED (www.TED.com/talks)

 
1 Comment

Posted by on September 23, 2011 in Technology for community participation

 

One of my course work for -Source of Internet Information

nformation seeking using search engines and social networking

1. What is search engines and social networking?

Evidently enough these days the production, storing, and retrieving of information in the web is increasing from time to time in an alarming rate. The world wide web has become an almost requiring operation in our day to day performance. People are using internet information for various reasons for personal( reciepe, tour guide, e-ticketing, and so on), Educational ( learning in open source course wares), marketing ( buying e-book, purchasing goods and services…etc), reflective commentary( personal or professional blogs), and so on so fourth. Therefore, when we see them separately social search is, as to Meredith et.al(2010), the use of social mechanisms to find information online. Moreover, as to some thoughtful studies social searching behavior is the posting of question to a Q&A site where other users (typically not known personally to the asker) can reply their possible opinions, reference to further resources(library, software…), or suggestions. However, there is possibility that social search can also involve the use of search engines, if the engine indexes social media (e.g., public Twitter, linkedin posts) or uses community members‟ actions to rank results or social tagging systems such as delicious (delicious.com)” (Meredith et.al, 2010, p.1). For instance, this is one of the social networking bing used for information seeking purpose called Linkedin. Thus, the ‘The elearning Guild’ sub members of linkedin are exchanging information by asking and replying messages to each others questions.

Search engine, in the other way, is a database created by software programs and focuses on databases created by keyword to find web sites therefore covers a large portion of the web than directories (Wendy (2007). For instance, www.msn.com, www.google.com, www.search.yahoo.com are some of the most commonly used searching engines.  As I have stated earlier, searching information using social search can include the use of search engines. Similarly, there are meta search engines like www.dogpile.com that present search results from various search engines together on one page.

2. Studies related to searching information using social

networks and search engines?

First I would like to appreciate to the investigators (Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, Katrina Panovich) for their basically significant lab study on comparing the social and non-social search complex and self-motivated information seeking works.

Accordingly, they have shown that using either of the information searching mechanisms has their own merest and demerits. It’s true that there are time that social searching would be more useful and convenient than searching engines and vise versa.

The conclusion on the comparison of searching on searching engines and asking on social networks is that most people will prefer to use a search engine to complete their chosen task than asking. This is because, as to Meredith et.al (2010), the very short time frame that people on face book or tweeter had to reply on an average half an hour.

However, I would prefer to indicate also the key difference they have scrutinized and suggested based on benefits in between social search and engines. The reasons searching is indicated as successful is:

1. Meredith et.al, 2010, using search engine provides the list of information with control over the search process, besides searchers also found answers more faster. Consequently, the result shows that the preference is more on seach

engines though few has also indicated that facebook might yield more responses given more time.

2. Meredith et.al, 2010 , the search engine also provides you with unlimited chance to refine the way you express the information in need as you learn more about the topic in a times.

3. The other success in using search engine is that the information it gives you is less biased than asking in facebook or tweeter. This usualy the problem with the social searching that people may reply with more personal, opinion and so on like the example provided in the article, “It feels to me like sources from the internet are more likely to be „authoritative‟ on the subject matter instead of the obviously biased opinions of friends.” (Meredith et.al, 2010, p.1)

Basically, it’s true that social networking has its own benefits what searching doesn’t have. The research output by Meredith also indicates similar to this. Most participants of the research has explained as searching was ordinarily preferred, however there were also some who has pointed out that asking in social networking has its own benefits. Among which:

1. It’s more motivating to ask than to search especially to people tie together on a similar interests. Then this will create a joy, and trust among our themselves.

2. Other success of using asking than searching as clearly stated is, “ The only participant who preferred the results from Facebook to those found with a

search engine liked the fact that her social network knew information about her, and thus was able to provide more customized answers. She explained

that what she found, ‘was completely relevant because the people know me and my daughter and what we would like – a search engine isn’t going to

know that’” ( Meredith et.al, 2010, p.3)

3. The usual displayed information exchange that anyone can recognize in asking using social networking(facebook, tweeter) is subjective questions

or opinion( for instance, what is the cheapest restaurant in Palma de mallorica, motel, direction to walk in the norther Spain, recipe and so on)

which you can’t find it in searching engines.

Besides, this has also the opportunity to improve the socialization behavior and skills among interactors. Therefore, on the basis of the above mentioned points each of them has their own strong contribution to our seeking information, hence it’s advised that we can use both of the searching and asking simultaneously considering the type of question or search issue we have. As both of the are complementary, these days there is a chance to get lists information which is sourced from both. Particularly while searching in searching engines.

3. Personal Opinion

I am so pleased to be exposed to the issue, and some scientifically investigated articles . Therefore, it does show not only where information is repository, but also how information can be best retrieved with which methods and searching ways in effective and efficient way. Hence, beyond the other many functions we get from searching engines and social networking, to know how best to feed ourselves with which means is quite significant. My case could be and additional example. As I told you I have lost my essay, as there happed a power cut intervention while composing. Then, I logged in to www.openoffice.org, for I am using Ubuntu desk top application,and I have posted my question to get some solutions to my problem. Of course, I couldn’t get an immediate reply, but read solutions to a similar probles that has been posted by someone else.

While I was reading other related materials, in one of them I have also found a website that provides us with lists of information sources in three column with request for rating. The site is www.blindsearch.fejus.com. Therefore, I consider the contingency of

being happening challenges in information seeking either in searching or asking,but with both its own unique features and advantages.

Reference:

1. Wendy E. M, 2007. ‘Search Smart: Locating and evaluating the Best of the Web’ , University of Georgia School of Law Library , pp. 1-25

2. Meredith RM, Jaime T, and Katrina Panovich 2007, ‘A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks ‘, ‘Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence ‘, pp.1-4

 

Sugata Mitra shows how kids teach themselves

PRODUCED AND POSTED BY: TED

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.