Various open educational resource advocates have forwarded their opinion, suggestion and possible solution on how to develop, distribute, and make OER expandable to everywhere under the concept of free educational resource for all. I have also tried to understand the need to raise this issue, the various opportunities that OER creates, and possible challenges and opportunities that movements can bring. For this reasons, I am convinced enough to participate in most movements on Open Educational Resource movements and practices.
The Open education resource movement has worked hard to widely expand the equity, usability and mind sharing among people all over the globe. It does surprise me the diversified types of knowledge area that this movement under its conceptual framework is trying to address, but I am also quiet impressed for the works already done to on awareness creation and material production. As it’s shown in many of the open resource materials, it’s clear that variety free technological( software and hard ware) inputs have been thought of, production capacities and challenges were proposed, distribution and expansion over the web were made openly available. Thanks to the innovation of the web which link educational resource and its end beneficiaries at the same point. Hence, if the availability and accessibility of open educational resources over the web reached to some optimal stage, its effect on creating knowledge society, skilled human personnel, educational literate( particularly in developing countries), and educational literacy would be assured in short time.
However, Stephen has mentioned in his review the threats that he think could hinder this movement and its possible inclusive solutions to make the OER sustainable. As a result, he described the challenges in a question saying that, “ what they are, who creates them, how we pay for this, how we distribute them and how we work with them”(2006). For the sake of explanation, he started by the definition of ‘Open’ in contrary to its commercial value of resources. Therefore, considering the vagueness and variety conceptual understanding amoung various organizations( UNESCO), private agents and individuals, he has stated the various alternative explanations and conceptual understandings on the issue. Moreover, as Ed Walker (2005) cited by Stephen(2006), defines ‘open’ as “convenient, effective, affordable, and sustainable and available to every learner and teacher worldwide.” Or Sir john Daniel, cited by Stephen (2006) who speaks of “The 4 As: accessible, appropriate, accredited, affordable.” In explanation to who creates them Stephen has also proposed possibly workable models of funding for open educational resource production. In a major aim to make distributional process and enabling the end user , he has also forwarded technical models in appreciation to the ones already initiated and made usable. As part of the methods to ease distribution of educational resources he has also encouraged to make our learning objects as reusable for continual applications. He hoped that “the sharable and reusable learning resources would reduce the cost needed to produce them” (2006). Moreover, he has also emphasized the inclusion of community not only as mere users but also as content creators, hence, in his explanation said, “It will be important to think of OERs not in isolation, but with respect to the community that accesses them and uses them “Open Content + Community = Open Course.” Hence, the development of a sustainable open content community is an integral part of the development of a network of OERs” (2006). Therefore, Stephen has intensively commented not only on this issues, but also other issues, the quality of the materials, the contribution of open softwares, re-usability and question of adaptation and modification in relation to copy right and publications.
In a nut shell, I also support this moment under the concept of, these knowledge, skill or attitude generating educational resources has to be given or made accessible to everyone as just a right to any human. They are the means and re-means for sustainable open educational resources usability and developments. As it’s stated free as freedom, not free as free beer.
Reference:
1. Stephen D. 2007. Sustainable Open Educational Resources in Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. [online] Available at: <http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=>[Accessed 26 October 2011]